Skip to main content

F1: Pay Drivers Back With A Bang

Max Chilton - F1 driver thanks to
his family's AON connection?
F1 has always had its share of pay drivers - those who get a seat purely because of the money they bring to a team in sponsorship. Sometimes those drivers pull off a surprise when they turn out to have some skills to back the money up - Sergio Perez and Pastor Maldonado are two recent examples.

However with the world in financial meltdown we have reached a point when an already small grid is so littered with drivers bringing a budget that we are losing talented drivers at a faster rate than at any time in history. In the last few weeks we've lost Timo Glock and Heikki Kovalainen to make room for pay drivers, whilst popular Japanese racer Kamui Kobayashi was unable to find a seat despite raising around $1m from fan donations after losing his drive at Sauber. HRT's failure further reduced the number of seats available, although the teams failure to perform probably restricted them to pay drivers only anyway.

F1 can't claim to be the pinnacle of motorsport when some of the world's best drivers are being denied the opportunity to race and disappearing off to other formulae. The FIA and Bernie Ecclestone need to recognise this and reorganise the sports funding to better support the midfield and back of the grid teams.

Currently F1 prize money is split between the top ten teams in the championship, with the major prizes going to the winners. Like it or not this has to change. These arrangements reinforce the status quo and only a company with the means to make massive investment can ever hope to break into the front running pack. Red Bull is the only team to have made the leap in recent years and that after burning though huge amounts of cash.

Reducing the costs of engines and gearboxes would make for a flatter playing field too. The manufacturers in the sport haven't really been creative enough with the branding of their supplier engines. Renault have done the best job, with the Lotus brand on its factory team and Infiniti branding on the Red Bulls. If the Red Bull engine supply was Nissan or Infiniti though this would go some way to offsetting some of the costs of being in the sport. Similarly FIAT have failed to utilise either the Alfa Romeo or Maserati brands for its customer teams. Both brands crying out for motorsport links. For FIAT having a Toro Rosso-Maserati on the grid has surely got to outweigh any income it currently gets from supplying the engines to the team?

Doing away with some in season testing has helped reduce budgets, but banning all in season testing would do even better. More so if it were replaced with an extra day on race weekends when teams are free to run their cars for as long as they like, but only in the hands of a test driver. This would make the test driver role a more valuable seat to have, allow young drivers to gain some experience and also make their reputations without being thrown straight in at the deep end of a race seat. The extra day of income for the circuits involved would probably make for a much better financial base to run the event from. I would imagine that the option of seeing tomorrow's stars spending a day blatting around the circuit in a current car would draw plenty of spectators.

All of these financial measures have a single outcome, by reducing the cost of being in the F1 circus it should allow teams to bring in drivers who deliver skill and not money as a prerequisite for their seat.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…