Skip to main content

Windows Phone 8 First Thoughts

Having had a full day with the HTC 8S I've made some observations about  the Microsoft's new mobile OS and how it compares to it's predecessor and competitors.

What's changed?

Well the biggest visible change is the ability to resize live tiles on the home screen. There's also customisation of the lock screen, using different photo repositories and choosing which applications can display lock screen icons.

Otherwise there's little change on the  face of things. It looks mostly the same and works in a similar way.

Performance is good, but side by side with a Nokia Lumia 800 running WP7 everything was just a hair slower on the 8S than the older OS.

The camera lens feature works, but is gimmicky and had been available on Android devices for a while. There's allegedly improved multi tasking, but in operation there seemed to be little difference. In theory Skype should be fully functional on WP8 but in practice notifications and calls work sporadically. It will certainly be a pleasant addition to the Microsoft armory when it comes out of beta, although none of the low end  WP8 phones announced so far have front facing cameras, so video calling will be off the table for them.

Whilst Windows Phone 8 is nice upgrade, as yet I see no compelling reason to select it over Android (for flexibility and choice) or iOS (for massive app support).

Windows Phone 8 does offer a beautiful user experience and excellent usability. However WP7 also offers these features and high end phones running the older OS are available for around half the price of a low end WP8 device. The latter may offer some better upgrade options, but right now unless you need the high end features of the Lumia 920 or HTC 8X I'd recommend searching out a bargain on a WP7 device instead.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…