Skip to main content

The iPhone 5 Deconstructed

For such a tiny product the iPhone 5 has certainly polarised opinions this week. Even in the context of the smartphone market war it seems excessive. But actually it's very easy to see why this has happened.
iPhone change has to be evolutionary, if Apple were to stir the mix too much it would introduce significant risk into its business model. Why? Asking customers to accept radical change will prompt those customers to consider an even more radical change to a different ecosystem and once they start thinking outside the Apple box there are a lot of excellent phones out there.
For current or former iPhone users this is the perfect upgrade, not too challenging but enough to create perceived value. Important when you're committing to spend somewhere north of £500.
That group of buyers are currently rushing to pre-order the new iPhone and be deliriously happy with their new phone when it arrives. I would suggest that the group will be almost exclusively made up of previous iPhone owners.
For people currently using other smartphones, particularly Android, this will look like a bit of a lame duck upgrade. All the reasons why they didn't buy an iPhone previously, added to a slightly bigger screen. Unlike the 4S which offered Siri or the 4 with its new industrial design, the iPhone 5 adds nothing to entice new users. All of its new capabilities have been present in Android phones for a while now. And if you're not locked into the Apple ecosystem now there's little compelling about the iPhone 5 to persuade you to do so...
So a phone that's both a brilliant upgrade and awfully disappointing at the same time? That'll be the new iPhone 5.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…