Skip to main content

Should We Be Able To Fix Our Technology?

Teardown specialists iFixit recently scored the new MacBook Pro at a new bnachmark low 1/10 for repairability, citing all sorts of design decisions which look like an active attempt to prevent the MBP from being repaired.

The MBP sports RAM soldered to the motherboard, a proprietry SSD and a battery glued to the shell of the laptop. Its a pretty unimpressive showing from a company that has been revelling in some sharp business practices recently.

The company has recently been fined £750k for mis-selling warranties through its Apple Stores in Italy. Its now being threatened with a 30-day forced closure of those same stores after failing to correct its process.

Its clear that Apple is seeking to reduce the serviceable life of its machines - after all its not uncommon to see older Mac machinery still being put to good use long after its PC brethren have been replaced and that's clearly seen as a lost sale at Cupertino. Make the machines unfixable and suddenly those old Mac users convert to new Mac sales.

Of course the main reason you see so many old Macs - and portable ones in particular - in use into old age is not anything to do with better longevity or performance. Its simply that replacing Apple hardware is costly and requires a solid decision making process. On the other hand PC laptops are commodity items that can be cheaply upgraded on much shorter cycles.

As someone who spent time taking failed PowerBook Duos and building one working machine from the parts of two or sometimes three donor machines, I know that there is a need for this to happen. By making this sort of repair difficult to impossible Apple is protecting itself at a cost (either in warranty or write-off charges) to its customers.

That's surely not an acceptable business plan into the future?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…