Skip to main content

America's Bizarre IP Playground

Intellectual property has become the hot legal battleground over the last five years. Prior to the iPhone's launch patent battles revolved around technical solutions and their infringement. RIM vs Good Technology was a perfect example.

Why has there been a change? I'm afraid we have to point the finger at Apple, who began this rapidly escalating war in an attempt to mask its weak position in "real" patents around telephony and data services.

The Motorola/Apple lawsuit shows the duplicity of Apple in these battles and the crazy inconsistencies in the application of patent law across the US (and parts of Europe too).
Apple argues that Motorola's lockscreen infringes upon its 'Slide to unlock' patent because a tap is a zero-length slide. Yet if that's the case then the patent itself is obviously invalid. Why? Because Windows Mobile 2003 implemented such a lockscreen more than four years before Apple came up with the iPhone. Yes it was a tap to unlock, but if Apple believes that a tap is a zero-length slide in 2012, it must also believe the same was true in 2003. Patent invalid, move on.

Its critical because Apple has used the same patent to block the sale of Galaxy Nexus phones in the US. A clearly invalid patent (by Apple's own admission) being used to restrict consumer choice in America by an American company.

A lovely image for independence day!

You can find out more about the Apple/Motorola case here:


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…