Skip to main content

Can You Brick A Tesla?

Tesla is currently in a war of words with Michael Degusta, publisher of The Understatement blog. At dispute is the potential to damage the batteries of the Tesla electric cars which have taken the market place by storm. Given that the replacement cost is circa $32k, that's an issue that's going to grab the attention of owners and prospective buyers alike.

What we know is that at least one Tesla owner - and maybe another five - has been presented with a hefty repair bill after their car was left to discharge for a period of time. It appears that having reached zero charge the batteries were then unable to take a further charge. 

Tesla seems to have been somewhat disingenuous with its responses to this problem. Its warranty appears to exclude repairs for failing to maintain a sufficiently charged battery; however there doesn't seem to be an appropriate level of notification to ensure that owners aren't inadvertently discharging their batteries and causing large repair bills. It has also tried to present Degusta's article as a 'shakedown' for warranty money - not my reading of the situation at all.

Whether it likes it or not Tesla has a problem - owners have to make very basic guesses as to the ability of their ride to complete a specific journey and then sit unattended until it will be next required. It is far from the get in and go simplicity of combustion engined cars and almost certain to hurt Tesla and the electric car's reputation. Dramatically in the long term as the cars enter the second hand market.

Tesla needs to build some form of isolation switch for the early (vulnerable) cars and retrofit as soon as possible. Anything less would be unacceptable...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…