Skip to main content

Mobile OS Fragmentation - Why Its Unimportant

You'll have probably seen the interesting chart mapping iOS and Android updates on phones sold in the US, which was published on the Understatement blog. It's asks some very big questions and paints Android buyers in a hard done by light. I should also say, if you read other posts on the blog it's published from a solidly pro-Apple point of view. That shouldn't detract from the points he makes.

However there is a bigger picture which hasn't really been focused upon: how much is the user impacted by these issues. I'd argue not very much.

The reasons why Android phones don't receive updates are various but mostly valid.

Google has a punishing schedule of adding functionality to Android which means that update flow much more quickly than other platforms.

Secondly, OEMs are producing a much wider choice of smartphones, at multiple price and functionality points. This makes it much harder to keep phones on the latest revision of the software and also means that some phones can't or won't benefit from some updates.

And thirdly, in many cases it doesn't make a significant difference to the user that the OS hasn't been updated because it doesn't change the experience. This has been true since the arrival of Froyo more than eighteen months ago, when it added Flash support to the OS.

I have three Android phones - one on Froyo and two on different point releases of Gingerbread. Is there any functional difference between them? No, I install the same software on each and perform all tasks the same way.

Latest figures from various data capturing organisations suggests that a large majority of Android users are running Froyo or later. So that chart we discussed earlier? Tells a very wrong story.

In response Android users could validly dispute that because the iPhone 4 is unable to run Siri it doesn't have the latest functionality of the full iOS 5 release and therefore fails the Understatement's test for being up to date.

Which makes the Android picture look a whole lot rosier in my book...


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…