Skip to main content

F1: What Constitutes Blocking?

Bit of a media frenzy over the battle between Hamilton and Schumacher at this weekend's Italian Grand Prix. Over the course of the first half of the race Schumacher was able to keep Hamilton behind him with some quite defensive driving and inspired positioning of his car through Monza's high speed corners.

Two moves have been called into question however, the first where Hamilton was forced onto the grass at the 170mph Curva Grande and the second approaching the tricky Lesmo corners where observers suggest the German changed line twice to defend his position, contrary to the rules which only allow one such change.

The first incident isn't worth discussing. Hamilton was never alongside Schumacher who therefore had the right to take his line through the corner, with the rule book requiring the following car to yield in these circumstances.

The second incident is harder to call. Schumacher makes a move to the right to block Hamilton, then moves back to the left to take the natural racing line through the corner. At the time that Schumacher moves left Hamilton is a long way behind and for that reason I don't believe that this constitutes a second defensive change of line. The stewards warned Mercedes that they were watching closely for any infringements yet no penalties were awarded. That suggests that the stewards and race director were all of a similar view that no offence had been committed.

So other than the British press taking the opportunity to kick their least favourite German, there isn't really a story here...


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…