Skip to main content

Review: SPB TV For Windows Mobile

Its not often that something gets cheaper and better at the same time, but this is what SPB have achieved with the new version of their IP TV viewer.

Having tried an earlier version of the software some time ago and found it to be worthy if in need of more work to be value for money I was not surprised to see that a new version of the program announced last week - after all SPB have a good reputation for continually improving their products, Mobile Shell being a good example.

I was surprised to see that TV was going to be a free application though and pleasantly surprised to see the way that this has been achieved.

Opening the program presents a horizontal line of channels which can be dragged left or right with the chosen channel's details being displayed in a window above. A quick tap and the channel starts to buffer. Here's where the payoff for the applications begins... Whilst the channel is buffering an advert is displayed. If you want advertising in an application this is how to do it, its not intrusive at all whilst still guaranteeing the eyeball time that advertisers crave.

Once loaded the channel plays fullscreen, automatically rotating to the best aspect ratio. A tap on the screen brings up a menu that offers options to change channels, re-buffer, adjust volume or brightness and return to the main screen. The channel changing option is particularly nicely implemented with a 'picture in picture' style selector.

What about channel choice? Well there's plenty of choice and something for pretty much everybody, especially if you're multilingual. For a selection of worldwide news channels it can't be faulted.

All in all an exemplary Windows Mobile application and another hit from SPB, go get it...


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…